4 Areas Where Meta Quest 3 Is Better Than Apple Vision Pro

Many commentators on the internet have hailed Apple’s Vision Pro, the company’s first foray into mixed reality, as the technological apex and computer of the future. Despite the validity of this argument, Meta is without a doubt the market leader in virtual reality and augmented reality, and the $500 Meta Quest 3 offers several advantages. If you’re looking for an alternative to Apple Vision Pro, the Meta Quest 3 has four major advantages.

Games and common areas

The Meta Quest 3 virtual worlds as shown in this image: Meta has been around since 2019, therefore it’s little wonder it has a huge leg up in the gaming industry. The business’s plan to spend millions of dollars on helping game developers make games for the platform has paid off. At this time, the majority of Meta Quest purchasers are avid gamers who can’t wait to experience virtual reality (VR) for themselves and to host virtual gatherings with loved ones.

Beyond just gaming, these communal areas let people from all around the globe experience the same world and its environs. One excellent example is VRChat, which facilitates user-to-user interaction in a virtual setting.

Controllers are required for the Vision Pro.: The lack of controllers is a major drawback of the Vision Pro when it comes to gaming. Imagine yourself using the Vision Pro to play the hit virtual reality shooter Onward. When it’s your time to shoot an adversary, not having a controller means you can’t control your steps or fire a gun.

The Vision Pro’s principal function is computation, not gaming, although one may argue otherwise. Think about how productive you would be at your desk using Vision Pro to finish jobs. Problematically, even with a headset, two users cannot simultaneously access the same window, thus if your boss requests that you work on a project with a colleague, you will not be able to do so.

Ease 2.

The Vision Pro isn’t as comfortable as the Quest 3, even though they’re just 100 grams heavier. Its top-heavy design makes it seem heavier than the Quest since the center of gravity is on the user’s nose/face.

Screenshot of the screen captured by Apple Vision Pro

Source: iFixit: Since Apple has packed an incredible 3,386 ppi display—in comparison to the 1,218 ppi display on the Quest 3—this could surprise a lot of people. When discussing the screen on these headsets, however, there are a lot more considerations than with smartphones. The first aspect to consider is the field of vision (FoV), which indicates the extent to which the headsets can capture visual information.

The field of view (FoV) is less than the Meta Quest 3, which makes it difficult to wear outside (though Apple hasn’t specifically said so).

Worth

It has long been known that Apple’s Vision Pro is an early product that was responsible for funding R&D. Contrarily, the business has drastically cut the cost of components for the third version of the Meta Quest. When it comes to shared areas and games, Meta Quest 3 can manage almost the same processes as the previous version, if not better.

As a result, the original Apple headset is more of a proof of concept for the future of what is possible with the advancement of technology. The day will come when we can put all these parts into a pair of glasses, similar to the Meta smart glasses, because of this.